Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page »

Haha silly wikidot - why would I have a message!


Re: Schismata OOC thread by Slinger RingoSlinger Ringo, 13 Jul 2018 04:05

Discord works for me!

And I've seen you, Ed, so it's likely you've seen me too :)

Re: Schismata OOC thread by IriahIriah, 11 Jul 2018 08:28

Discord would be my choice

Re: Schismata OOC thread by Slinger RingoSlinger Ringo, 10 Jul 2018 05:32

I've certainly heard of Microscope and I know several friends of mine have played it but I've never tried it myself! Maybe we should give it a go.

Where's the best place to contact everyone? I know I've seen Iriah on Steam from time (…at least, I think it's Iriah I'm bad at tracking name changes) but maybe we should set up a Discord or something to plan things

Re: Schismata OOC thread by EdcrabEdcrab, 09 Jul 2018 12:33

Hello hello! I'm always down for anything Exigency. Foreverandever.

I'm intrigued by Microscope, which I've always wanted to try but never had the right moment.

Re: Schismata OOC thread by IriahIriah, 07 Jul 2018 14:27

I'd be kind of curious if we could do a worldbuilding game like Microscope (which I own but haven't played) or something similar in the setting. Just to give it a kind of framework and make it still be social?

Re: Schismata OOC thread by Slinger RingoSlinger Ringo, 07 Jul 2018 05:13

Sorry I completely forget to check this site half the time… but I'm still kicking! Glad you're still playing, I haven't had a group in ages but should remedy that

I haven't talked to Phil in a reeaally long time (let us know if you're still around, Phil!) but I did a little catching up with V last month, which was good

I'm still wanting to Do A Thing™ with the Exigency setting/rules but I haven't worked much on it lately. I was actually thinking of setting up some kind of shared file (Google doc maybe?) that everyone could collaborate on re: worldbuilding because I'll be honest, for me half the fun of the setting was the collaborative storytelling component and how we ended up with a small established cast and a kind of canon, of a sort. Basically I miss playing with you guys and while another game is always good we seem to be having trouble scraping together a group so in the meantime, well, consider this me issuing an invitation to everyone to have more of a hand in the creation of the setting

Re: Schismata OOC thread by EdcrabEdcrab, 03 Jul 2018 01:23

Anybody around? I just started playing some roll20 games with PA folk the last couple weeks and it made me miss you guys.

How are you all doing?

Re: Schismata OOC thread by Slinger RingoSlinger Ringo, 17 Jun 2018 20:09

I'm good, and wish everyone the best, here's to 2018 beating 2017!

I still haven't heard from Phil in a long time and this is what worries me about the internet, how easy it is for someone to vanish when you don't have any other way to stay in touch :/

Re: Schismata OOC thread by EdcrabEdcrab, 06 Jan 2018 17:23

Aw man, Ed. That sucks.

Wanted to say Happy New Year to everyone!

Hope you're all doing well

Re: Schismata OOC thread by Slinger RingoSlinger Ringo, 02 Jan 2018 12:38

Argh. It was a dodgy site and we left it for good reason but it seems that the forumer board is now gone completely, and I've only saved a tiny fraction of the content from it :/

I'm pretty upset about that: not just my writing lost, but effectively years of player time and effort too. Just to say I hope everyone else is doing okay while I kick myself

Re: Schismata OOC thread by EdcrabEdcrab, 29 Oct 2017 21:06

My roommate just got a new job (yay!) and will most likely be a bit too busy to join anytime soon (boo!)

I will hopefully be making my character creation posts tonight or tomorrow at gamersplane (yay!)

Re: Schismata OOC thread by Slinger RingoSlinger Ringo, 11 Apr 2017 21:34

Fantastic. I've applied to join.

Re: Schismata OOC thread by IriahIriah, 08 Apr 2017 17:03

Well if needs be we can start with three and see how things go. Game is up!

Re: Schismata OOC thread by EdcrabEdcrab, 07 Apr 2017 21:32

I posted a thing! Hopefully someone will feel motivated to respond!

Re: Schismata OOC thread by Slinger RingoSlinger Ringo, 05 Apr 2017 19:37

No one else has posted at the time of writing but I guess you could chime in and post a line about what kind of character you're interested in playing, yeah.

Also there's an "Introductions" sub-forum for newcomers but now you've got me thinking about etiquette. Maybe it's not the done thing to post there if you initially joined just to play one game? Although if you plan on sticking around and playing in other campaigns, maybe that works!

Re: Schismata OOC thread by EdcrabEdcrab, 05 Apr 2017 11:06

Great. Should we post a hello?

Re: Schismata OOC thread by IriahIriah, 05 Apr 2017 06:02

Yeah, producing a book is definitely a long-term goal. Rules first, then maybe even a sourcebook for the setting if I've got it in me.

Anyway I've put a tavern thread up! Rally, squad!

Next step is making a sub-forum and IC/OOC etc but I'll at least wait for responses from the other prospective players first.

Re: Schismata OOC thread by EdcrabEdcrab, 04 Apr 2017 21:25

Talents being soft emulations of classes is a really interesting thought and it clears a few things up for me! It reminds me of what I thought was the class system from earlier versions - selecting (or buying?) TK/mutant/Telempath/cyborg/batman (well-trained and equipped normal). I guess that's almost analogous to a racial choice. If you wanted to lean on it further, it might be interesting if they came parcelled with talent ranks. Picking TK gives you 1 Psionics: TK + 1 extra talent rank. Picking cyborg gives you 3 ranks wherever you choose … and so on.

And, yes, as much as I enjoy fiddling with builds, I'm here for the robots and spaceships and being a celebrity pirate. When you talk about wanting to make something of the system, do you mean packaging it and releasing it in as an rpg book? I may have asked this before and forgotten the answer. But that's a cool idea. And it reminds me, I need to download inDesign again.

Re: Schismata OOC thread by IriahIriah, 03 Apr 2017 14:46

I like reading people’s thoughts! And I don’t think they’re suspect: I think it helps to have a variety of views to consider. I’ve no illusions about pleasing every type of RPG player but I don’t want to actively alienate any, either. But speaking of alienation, LONG POST warning…

I’m feeling less and less good about Insight. I just feel like it’s stepping on FOC’s toes, and yet it also serves as analysis (MND) and intuition/lucky guesses (WIL). Once upon a time those were all separate skills! To say nothing of including the since-removed ranged skill.

I’ll remove its combat component for sure. It might still have combat applications in very specific situations, mostly if a target is using Stealth, but it won’t be the default “make a ranged attack” Talent anymore. I think “Insight” as a name too strongly correlates with Focus too but I’m not sure how to approach that. “Thinking” or “Cognition” are too broad, “Analysis” has the opposite problem. Hmm.

I might turn Melee into Combat. STR and AGI to make melee attacks using Combat, FOC for ranged. And MND for tactics, I guess. I don’t like that it makes it “the” fighting talent, but I’ve always thought talents are about approaches/styles as much as they are actual skills and capabilities.

Base attack bonuses in D&D always made me think: that’s cool for a fighter, but what if I wanted to do something else with those points. And in part that’s where talents came from: they’re a big deal! Even one point in a talent is a significant thing. It means you’re pretty good at the thing, with the potential to become an absolute master of that thing. I think of each talent as something that benefits an entire party, not just an individual: that it’s good to have the frontline Melee (or whatever) character, and the Tech character, and the face with Social. In a different setting, talents could easily have been called Thief and Cleric and Fighter instead. They’re very class-like.

Bringing up Shadowrun reminds me of etiquettes etc. I wonder if I should embrace specialities a bit more (as they are now, that is, not back when that was the name for skills). That +2 bonus to a very specific thing? Maybe every character gets a couple depending on their level, and they don’t need to spend aspects/resources on it. Unless they want more, of course. Perhaps it’s specific to every talent you the player pick: you picked Mobility? Okay, you get a speciality to go with it, just so your Mobility is a little different from your ally’s Mobility rank. Maybe you’re good at navigating urban environments and Bob over there is a really goddamn good swimmer, and so on.

(Specialities are supposed to be usable with any talent, but I don’t think that’s a problem. I think it’s reasonable that there are potentially situations where a very niche speciality could apply to an unusual talent use. Bob is fighting underwater? Well, I’d be an ass to disallow using his expert swimmer speciality with Melee. That kind of situation)

The points you make about social interactions have all been in the back of my mind. That is: for a system that ostensibly has a universal resolution mechanic, pretty much all the aspects speak in terms of combat and attacking. “Attacking” using Social is entirely mechanically possible but doesn’t quite gel, especially as it would be chipping away at the same Hit Points depleted by swords and grenades. I think some of the aspect abilities would work okay with Social mind: a statement that Slows a crowd by making them doubt themselves or fear you. That kind of thing.

Maybe from the GM's point of view there's some kind of background escalation or noise counter, and at certain stages Social becomes impossible, but it can decrease it. You just did a full attack with Combat and blew someone's head apart? Well, uh, maybe not. Looks like the counter's hit max.

Speaking of escalation, 13th Age has backgrounds in place of skill ranks: super broad, potentially applicable to every skill check. I think that system is cool but I went with preset named talents, not things you customise, just so there’s a shared pool for every character. Instead of 13th Age’s “Swamp Ranger +3” Exigency would present that as Insight (bluh at that name) +1, Mobility +2 (and a +2 speciality bonus in swamps), and so on. I think it makes things easier for both the GM and the party because there’d be a lot less wrangling over what’s applicable and less accusations of power gaming (“seriously? You’re arguing that your membership of a group called The Brotherhood of Every Skill means that you trained to be good with every skill?”)

And okay off the top of my head, how’s this for a potentially big shake-up: Talents as a type of aspect that you invest XP into, coming with a built-in speciality. It could open the door to all sorts of esoteric talents but would, of course, play havoc with the current balance. You’d need more aspect slots, potentially. But you could also have Talents that increase armour per rank, or critical damage per rank, and all sorts of weird and wonderful stuff.

This has been my long-term goal to be honest: a version of Exigency that doesn’t distinguish between aspects and resources etc, just treats them differently based on their source/theme. Picking and choosing everything and using them to fill a combined set of slots. Losing an aspect due to an injury, for example, is already a sort of baked-in Compromise. Except for an aspect instead of a resource. I don’t know, there’s a lot to think about, and even though I tell myself to stick with what I’ve got for a game that’s just around the corner I can’t help thinking: this is maybe the perfect time to tweak this stuff. Just before a fresh new playtest, rather than halfway through one as an afterthought. I’ll need to do a big ol’ write-up about all this.

But, eh, don’t want to forget that the main reason I’m doing all this is for the campaigns I get to run and the stories we get to tell. Mechanics are really important and I want to make something of this system, sure, but the setting and narrative are the main reason I got into all this shit in the first place. Exigency as a setting with a default system, rather than a system with a default setting.

Re: Schismata OOC thread by EdcrabEdcrab, 02 Apr 2017 19:04
page »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License